In re Disciplinary Action Against Martin
Also decided on this docket: Minn., December 29, 2005 707 N.W.2d 368
Cited by
- Jermaine Octavious Stansberry, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- Nathan Christopher Braun, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- Otha Eric Townsend v. State of Minnesota 867 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 2015
- Kyle Richard Greene v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Hooper v. State 838 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 2013
- Townsend v. State 834 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 2013
- Townsend v. State 767 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 2009
- Arredondo v. State 754 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 2008
- Nunn v. State 753 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 2008
- Cooper v. State 745 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 2008
- Johnson v. State 733 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- Gail v. State 732 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 2007
Opinion text
ORDER By order filed on September 14, 2005, this court suspended respondent Richard H. Martin for 30 days, with reinstatement conditioned, among other things, upon respondent’s successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination within one year from the date of filing of the order. Although respondent was reinstated to active practice by order filed on December 29, 2005, respondent has not yet provided evidence of his successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination, as required by the September 14, 2005, order. Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Richard H. Martin is suspended from the practice of law until such time as respondent provides evidence of successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. Respondent’s suspension shall be effective 14 days from the date of this order. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR) and shall provide written notice of his suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals. BY THE COURT: /s/Helen M. Meyer, Associate Justice